The Supreme Court is also responsible for establishing rules of practice and procedures for the Court of Justice, which includes the conduct of judges and attorneys. Cases involving the death penalty, life imprisonment or imprisonment for twenty years or more go directly from the circuit court level, where the cases are tried, to the Supreme Court for review as a matter of right. Attorneys with written briefs and oral arguments addressing the legal issues, which the Court must decide, present the case to the Supreme Court. The justices, as a panel, hear appeals of decisions from the lower courts and issue decisions or "opinions" on cases.Ī case, which comes before the Supreme Court, is not retried. The Chief Justice of the Commonwealth is chosen by his or her colleagues and serves a term of four years. It consists of seven justices who are elected from the seven appellate districts and serve eight-year terms. Therefore, there is no formal published decision by the Information Commissioner that is linked to this appeal.The Supreme Court of Kentucky is the court of last resort and the final interpreter of state law. ** Please note that this Supreme Court appeal concerned a decision by the Information Commissioner to conciliate an external review. Therefore, there is no formal published decision by the Information Commissioner that is linked to any of these decisions. * Please note that these Supreme Court decisions concerned decisions by the Information Commissioner to stop dealing with an external review under section 67(1)(b) of the FOI Act. Our most recent Stat Pack, which includes these and other variables for the October 2021 term, can be found here (published July 1, 2022). PEARLMAN -v- WA A/INFORMATION COMMISSIONER On this page, we keep ongoing statistics for the October 2022 term dispositions by sitting, majority opinions authored by sitting, pace of grants, pace of decisions and the circuit scorecard. PEARLMAN -v- THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA S -v- DEPARTMENT FOR CHILD PROTECTION AND FAMILY SUPPORT SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES TRIBUNAL -v- WEST AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPERS LTDĪPACHE NORTHWEST PTY LTD -v- DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND PETROLEUM ĪPACHE NORTHWEST PTY LTD -v- DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND PETROLEUMĭEPARTMENT OF STATE DEVELOPMENT -v- LATRO LAWYERS TEMWOOD HOLDINGS PTY LTD -v- WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING COMMISSION & ANOR WASCA 112īGC (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD -v- FREMANTLE PORT AUTHORITY & ANORĭEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND WORKS -v- BOWDEN INFORMATION COMMISSIONER FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA -v- MINISTRY OF JUSTICEĬHANNEL 31 COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION LTD -v- INGLIS HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA - v- AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION LTD POLICE FORCE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA -v- AYTON Here are some of the biggest cases to watch that are on the calendar for the 2021-22 term. POLICE FORCE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA -v- WINTERTON ![]() POLICE FORCE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA -v- KELLY & ANOR ![]() * Please see the Freedom of Information Amendment Act 2004 & a summary of the change to clause 5(1)(b) here Making submissions to the Information Commissioner.Information Statements and other required publications.Repeated requests and unreasonable conduct.What if there are many third parties to consult?.Large, complex or time-consuming applications.How long should it take to deal with an access application.Key questions for decision-makers to consider.Flowchart - Dealing with an access application.What if the agency delays making a decision?.Can the agency refuse to deal with my access application?.What if the agency says it doesn’t have the documents?.How long should it take to deal with an access application?.Children and people with intellectual difficulties.Applying for documents during the COVID-19 pandemic.Can others access information about me or my business?.Local govt, public sector employment & prisoner records. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |